Date of Publication :22nd August 2017
Abstract: Wireless technologies are essential and important part of today’s world. Zigbee technology is one of them and getting more popularity due to its advantages like low power and low-cost reliability. It is operated on 2.4 GHz industrial scientific and medical band. On the same band, there is another standard which is 802.11n wifi standard is also operated. When both the technologies coexist together then there is interference occurs. As data rate of zigbee is very less compared to the wifi impact of interference is more on zigbee technology. In this work new features of channel bonding, frame aggregation and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) is applied to the 802.11n and effect of 802.11n on zigbee technology is measured using different performance metrics packet delivery ratio(PDR), bit error rate (BER), control overhead and throughput
Reference :
-
[1] Daniele Croce, Pierluigi Gallo, Domenico Garlisi, Fabrizio Giuliano, Stefano Mangione, Ilenia Tinnirello, “ErrorSense: Characterizing WiFi Error Patterns for Detecting ZigBee Interference”, pp.447- 452, IEEE 2014.
[2] Mohd Adib Sarijari, Anthony Lo, Mohd Sharil Abdullah, Sonia Heemstra de Groot,Ignas G.M.M. Niemegeers, Rozeha A.Rashid, “Coexistence of Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Wireless Technologies in Smart Grid-Home Area Network.”, International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp.576–581, IEEE 2013.
[3] Sajdl Ondrej, Bradac Zdenek, Fiedler Petr, Hyncica Ondrej, “ZigBee Technology and Device Design”, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, , IEEE 2006.
[4] Zenghua Zhao, Xuanxuan Wu, Xin Zhang, Jing Zhao, Xiang-Yang, “ZigBee vs WiFi: Understanding Issues and Measuring Performances of their Coexistence”, IEEE 2014
[5] Shehzad Amir, Young-June Choi, Mohd Sharil Abdullah, Sonia Heemstra de Groot, Ignas G.M.M. Niemegeers, Rozeha A.Rashid, “Interference Coordination Scheme between WiFi and Zigbee Networks.”, 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, pp.91–93, IEEE 2012
[6] Charbel Nicolas and Michel Marot, “Dynamic Link Adaptation Based on Coexistence- Fingerprint Detection for WSN.”, 11th annual Mediterranean ad hoc networking workshop, pp.90–96, IEEE 2012
[7] Byung Soo Kim, Ho Young Hwang, and Dan Keun Sung, “Effect of Frame Aggregation on the Throughput Performance of IEEE 802.11n”, International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp.1740–1744, IEEE 2008
[8] Nickolas J. LaSorte, Samer A. Rajab, Hazem H. Refai, “Experimental Assessment of Wireless Coexistence for 802.15.4 in the Presence of 802.11g/n”, International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp.473–479, IEEE 2012.
[9] Vasos Hadjioannou, Constantinos X. Mavromoustakis, George Mastorakis, Evangelos Pallis, Dimitrios Stratakis, Dimitra Valavani, “On the Performance Comparison of the Agent-based Rate Adaptivity Scheme for IEEE 802.11n and ZigBee.”, International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia, IEEE 2016.
[10] Emerson A. Marconato, Daniel F. Pigatto, Kalinka R. L. J. Castelo Branco, Jean Aime Maxa, Nicolas Larrieu, Alex S. R. Pinto, “IEEE 802.11n vs. IEEE 802.15.4: a study on Communication QoS to provide Safe FANETs”, 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops, pp.184–191, IEEE 2016.
[11] Daniel Ihlenfeldt, Afshin Amini, Clint Powell, “Investigating the Effects of 802.11n Interference on Home Area Networks”, 1st IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability, pp.218–222, IEEE 2013.